Laura Equirels Like Water for Chocolate Essays -- Esquivel Like Water

Laura Esquirels, similar Water for Chocolate, is a modern day Romeo and Juliet filled with mouthwatering recipes. It has become a valued part of the Statesn literature. The novel became so popular that it was actual into a film, becoming a success in both America and Mexico. Alfonso Arau directs the film. After reading the novel and seeing the exposure, I discovered both(prenominal)(prenominal) distinct differences between the two as well as some riveting similarities. The novel begins with the main character, Tita, being born on the kitchen t able-bodied. Tita had no need for the usual slap on the bottom, because she was already crying as she emerged maybe that was because she knew that it would be her lot in life to be denied wedding party Tita was literally washed into this world on a great course of tears that spilled over the edge of the table and flooded across the kitchen trading floor (Esquirel 6). Although this is included in the film with tremendous accuracy, the mo vie begins with a diametric scene. The movie opens with Titas father going to a bar to detect the birth of his daughter. On the way a friend informs him of his wifes, momma Elena, affair with a man having Negro blood in his veins. The grave news brings on a heart attack killing him instantly. In the book, this information is not given until the middle chapters. As the novel continues, other character is introduced, Gertrudis. Gertrudis, the older sister of Tita, is the first to rebel against her mothers wishes. Wanting to escape the securities of home, Gertrudis is overwhelmed by her lustful passions. A soldier, not similarly far absent, Juan, inhales the aroma of her desire and heads her way. The aroma from Gertrudis body guided himThe womanhood desperately needed a man to quench the red-hot ardour that was raging inside herGertrudis stopped running when she saw him riding toward her. bleak as she was, with her loosened hair falling to her waist, luminous, glowing with ene rgy, she might endure been an angel and devil in one womanWithout slowing his gallop, so as not to waste a moment, he leaned over, put his spike around her waist, and lifted her onto the horse in front of him, face to face, and carried her awayThe movement of the horse combined with the movement of their bodies as they made hunch for the first time, at a gallop and with a great grant of difficulty (Esquirel 55). This imagery is tremendous. Every sense that Esquir... ...said, Beauty is in the gist of the beholder. Another striking difference between the movie and the book is that both are developed by incompatible sexes. This obviously could effect the equation and contrast views of this paper. For example, being male, I found that the two images that left the sterling(prenominal) impression were of sexual nature, Gertrudis making love with the soldier, and Tita being intimate with Pedro. The different views of the sexes may also be the answer to some of the contrasts betwe en the movie and novel. For instance, the death of Mama Elena. Esquirels version fits the emotional death, suicide, geared toward the effeminate audience, while Araus shows a much sexual and violent death, extinguish the male desire for action. In conclusion, I found the novel more entertaining than the movie. The reason the movie fell short in expectations is because Esquirel does a great job in allowing the reader to draw on their imaginations. However, Arau is able to capture this imagery occasionally throughout the movie. Furthermore, most of the changes added to the movie were grand, which added to the kick and plot of the story. Overall, both are memorable and deserve their legacy.