.

Tuesday, December 25, 2018

'Seven events that shaped the New Testament world Essay\r'

'The conviction of the group that savior comes in contact with when at Matthew’s is that â€Å"one who claims to be holy should non slang dinner with tax collectors and delinquencyners.” In those ancient times, tax collectors were perceived a bad circulate that was do up of sinners. To the Pharisees who thought of themselves as the holy lot, associating or even talking to tax collectors was an curse. They place themselves as the only holy state and the make full to clean spiritually and consequently could not associate with sinners. Their group was made of the Pharisees and anybody who did contrary to their beliefs was considered unholy (Carter, 2013).\r\nSome of the pile whom they did not associate with were the flush, prostitutes and the tax collectors. The sick were considered unholy be stir the Pharisees believed that sickness was caused by sins, whoredom was a condemnation because it was a sin and the tax collectors were considered sinners because of their c verbotenh ways of lay in taxes. messiah came to make the wrongs right, He thus does complete opposite of what the Pharisees believed in. This do works a lot of mis understandings between deliveryman and the Pharisees because they c atomic number 18 most about maintaining their phantasmal holiness than grasp out to those in motif of be whole again, that is, without sins or diseases as a result of their preaching and works of kindness to those in need (Holy Bible, 2007).\r\nIn the text, at its most basic, the conflict between messiah and the leaders is about doing against the set unearthly rules. The rule that Jesus breaks in this mise en scene is that a holy person should not eat from the akin table with sinners. In this case, Jesus was eating to bulge outher with Matthew in his place and Matthew is a tax collector. This is so because tax collectors were not only disreputable sinners b arely also were considered as spies of the roman letterss against their ass ociated Jews. Nobody love any man who worked at the impose office. Thus, they lived a secluded life corresponding outcasts in their own community.\r\nMatthew sought to bring his old acquaintances to hear the messiah. After his calling, he now understands how powerful the grace of Christ was and would like his fellow tax collectors to pay off the same. This portrays that the ones who have an experience with the Christ develops a desire that others be brought to him to have the same experience. As Jesus points out, those who think that their souls are not ailing do not long for a spiritual medico (Holy Bible, 2007).\r\nThis was a direct hit to the Jews since they could not understand that Jesus, as John the Baptist said, was overture to heal the sick, to cleanse the sinners and to give hold to those who were in despair. Jesus demonstrated that he came for all by incorporating all in His teachings and day to day encounters but the Judaic despised Him because they held a view th at they are whole. The that the poor publicans and sinners felt that they were in need of amendment and instruction but could not get it from the Pharisees and that is why Jesus kept them close to make them whole against. This was a invariable cause of mistaking between him and the Jews (Holy Bible, 2007).\r\n in that location are several(prenominal) things we need to get it on about the historical world to understand the conflict between Jesus and the leaders at the Matthew’s. First, the Jewish state out rightly regarded tax collectors as conspirators because they worked for the papist regime, and had the power of papistical militaries behind them so as to brutally compel people to pay levies. They were most rarefied traitors with Roman regime (Carter, 2013).\r\nSecondly, Jewish regarded tax collectors to be extortionists because they kept everything they collected. Since tax collectors bid for a contractor to collect taxes in especial(a) areas, the Romans gave the co ntracts to the person with the highest bid. The bidder would collect levies, give the Roman Empire what he had promised and would keep the rest. Therefore, there were many instances where the tax collectors levied high taxes and trick with any opportunity they found so as to amass as more money as they could. For them, this was a pedigree with wholesome profit making as they deemed necessary (Holy Bible, 2007).\r\nThirdly, when a Jew got into the duties’ service, he was considered a cast away from the society. He was illegalise as a judge or an eye witness in a law court hearing, was barred from the temple and in the face of the public, his discredit lengthen to his kinfolks. This shows how bad the Jews abominated the tax-leviers to an extent of considering them sinners, an abomination in the society and this hatred protract to their family. Their grounds on which this kind of hate was based were genuine no admire they were so bitter on Jesus when he associated with sinners and even went to an extent of dinning with them (Kraybill, 2003). The raise of contention here is the cause of construe between Jesus and the Jewish. What the Jewish do not seem to understand is that Jesus had come to make right that which is wrong.\r\nThe subtile of the above past practices informs me in several ways in the process of class period the Matthew gospel. First, I now understand that the Jews were material fanatics of their religious dogmas. They highly valued deference to their religious practices with an aim of staying clean and straight. Secondly, I now understand that every misunderstanding between Jesus and the Jews had a cause and it had something to do with a contradiction of the Jewish existing religious doctrines. Lastly, the misunderstandings were always eminent between Jesus and the Jewish religious leaders because the Jews were not ready to deport the purpose for the coming of Christ. If only they understood, they would have compromised to acc ommodate His teachings (Carter, 2013).\r\nReferences\r\nCarter, W. (2013).Seven events that shaped the New testament world.\r\nHoly Bible: NRSV, New rewrite Standard Version. (2007). New York: Harper Bibles.\r\nKraybill, D. (2003). The upside down kingdom.Scottdale, Pa.: Herald Press.\r\nSource document\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment