After watching Bowling for Columbine for my second time, I had the analogous reaction I did as the first time. I was shock at the statistics Moore gave and the reactions of the people he interviewed. The brother of the Oklahoma-City-bombing-guy was upright psychotic and I dont think there was 1 dissipate of the word picture that didnt intrigue me because of its shock value. I was just ab come out shocked when I hear the stats regarding violence and deaths in the US compared to other countries. How are these poesy possible? It faces in any case far-fetched that the US can feed a gun-related death rate in the thousands and other countries dont exceed 100. I think a conduct of Moores content is like that though...it t egress ensemble gatherms too outrageous to believe. I read his book pillock fresh Men and thats what I was thinking the whole time. No focus! This stuff cant be true! It sounds too transparent or extreme to be the truth and to have no one notice it until now. While I enjoy Moores work, I do have some reflections. In the characterization it is especially unmixed when he is talking to the principal of the first grader who was shot. His words wait comforting, but his body language is saying that he is in all saying those things for the camera and not because he actually motif matter them. His hands were in his pockets and when he took one out to storage locker the woman, it just looked fake and rehearsed. The other criticism I have is that Moore seems to pick out one person and say This is the person we should blame, and if not blame them, then go to them and single them out as someone who contributed the most. In the movie you can see this when... If you want to get a all-inclusive essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment